Ohio Adjusts Candidate Filing Forms to Include Name History Requirement

In recent elections, several transgender candidates in Ohio faced disqualification due to an unexpected requirement to disclose their previous names when filing paperwork to run for office. The issue came to light when Vanessa Joy, a transgender woman who sought to represent Ohio House District 50, was informed that her candidacy was invalid. The reason given was her failure to list previous names, often referred to as "deadnames," as required by state law.

Changes to Candidate Filing Forms

Following these disqualifications, Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose initiated changes to the forms that potential candidates use in the state. Candidates are now explicitly instructed to "include all prior names used in the past 5 years," excluding those changes resulting from marriage. This amendment aims to clarify the requirements and prevent future confusion for candidates.

"The new form does that, and it’s now available on our website for potential candidates to use if they decide to file a candidacy in 2025," a spokesperson for Secretary LaRose confirmed.

Impact on Transgender Candidates

Vanessa Joy's experience brought attention to the legal nuances that can disproportionately impact transgender individuals seeking public office. Joy had fulfilled all other requirements, including gathering necessary signatures, but was caught off-guard by the requirement to disclose her name change. "Something that is that important should have been on the instructions," Joy stated. "It should have been on the petition."

Her appeal against the disqualification was denied by the Stark County Board of Elections, which maintained that the law was "unambiguous."

Other transgender candidates in Ohio faced similar challenges. Bobbie Arnold and Arienne Childrey encountered legal obstacles due to this law but were ultimately allowed to contest their elections. Ari Faber, another transgender candidate, had to run under his deadname because he had not legally changed his name by the time of the election.

Legislative Responses

The controversy surrounding these disqualifications prompted both Democratic and Republican lawmakers in Ohio to introduce bills attempting to address the issue. However, despite bipartisan efforts, neither of these proposals succeeded in passing through the state legislature.

Joy expressed hope that the recent changes to the filing forms would benefit future transgender candidates. Yet, she has decided against running for office again. Her case highlights the ongoing challenges faced by transgender individuals in the political arena.

These developments underscore the importance of clear and inclusive policies that accommodate the diverse backgrounds of all candidates, including those who are transgender. As communities continue to strive for greater equality, ensuring fair access to political participation remains a critical goal.

Stay informed about issues that impact your community by subscribing to our newsletter. Connect with the latest news and events shaping the LGBTQ+ landscape both locally and globally.

By fostering awareness and advocating for inclusive reforms, it is possible to create a more equitable political process in Ohio and beyond. As the discussion continues, the hope is to see positive changes that empower all individuals to participate fully in democratic processes.

Ohio's experience serves as a reminder of the need for continuous evaluation and adaptation of laws and regulations to reflect the evolving understanding of gender identity and inclusivity.