Rutger published: Meta's New Policies Raise Concerns for LGBTQ+ Community

LGBTQ+ Advocates Alarmed by Meta's Recent Policy Changes

In recent weeks, LGBTQ+ advocates have voiced serious concerns over new policy changes implemented by Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. These changes are perceived as undermining protections for queer youth and accommodating a conservative agenda in Washington.

Meta, led by Mark Zuckerberg, has historically been seen as a supporter of LGBTQ+ rights. However, recent actions suggest a shift in this stance. A short-lived Instagram profile named Liv, created as part of Meta's AI experiments, showcased a "proud black Queer momma of 2" but was quickly deleted, sparking online discourse.

Restrictions on LGBTQ+ Content

Independent journalist Taylor Lorenz uncovered that Instagram had been restricting access to LGBTQ+ content for months, blocking teens from searching related terms. This revelation is not surprising to Celia Fisher, a psychology professor at Fordham University, who has dedicated her career to researching adolescent health in marginalized groups.

Fisher explained how social media has been pivotal in reaching a national audience for her research, which uses targeted ads linked to keywords and celebrities to connect with LGBTQ+ youth. The blocking of these keywords presents a significant barrier to recruiting participants and conducting crucial research on mental health, HIV prevention, and vaccine hesitancy.

Such restrictions are not only detrimental to research but also harmful to LGBTQ+ youth. “Preventing access to these terms means youth are cut off from their community, which is particularly devastating for transgender individuals,” Fisher noted.

Meta's Response and Further Policy Changes

When questioned about the restrictions, a Meta spokesperson described them as unintentional mistakes, affirming that LGBTQ+ terms are not considered sensitive under their policies. Nevertheless, Meta's immediate removal of longstanding hate speech policies against LGBTQ+ individuals casts doubt on their commitment.

Mark Zuckerberg announced sweeping changes via a video, where he mentioned eliminating independent fact-checking in favor of a system akin to "community notes," similar to platform X. Critics argue that these changes align with conservative political pressures, especially following the recent election.

The changes quickly drew attention from GLAAD and other organizations, who reported adjustments to policies governing hateful conduct. Notably, certain slurs and derogatory phrases targeting transgender individuals are now permitted without restriction, highlighting a troubling shift in Meta's approach.

Impact on LGBTQ+ and Marginalized Communities

Meta's updated training manuals, as reported by The Intercept, differentiate between different members of the LGBTQ+ community, allowing derogatory language against some while prohibiting it against others. This discrepancy extends to other marginalized groups, further complicating the landscape of online safety and respect.

The removal of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs and the deletion of transgender and non-binary themes from Messenger compound these concerns, signaling a retreat from previous commitments to inclusivity.

Arturo Béjar, a former engineering director at Meta and expert in online harassment, expressed his horror at these developments. “Meta is abandoning its responsibility to user safety, and without transparency into the impacts on teenagers, the damage could be profound,” he stated.

Fisher echoed these concerns, emphasizing the potential negative impact on LGBTQ+ youth's mental health. “Experiencing or witnessing harassment online deters individuals from engaging with supportive communities,” she said, highlighting the risk of increased civil rights violations and violence against LGBTQ+ individuals.

Returning to a Dark Era

Fisher, a psychologist, warns that these developments represent a regression to a time when LGBTQ+ individuals were wrongly pathologized. "Spreading misinformation about mental health further endangers transgender people," she emphasized.

The ongoing changes at Meta underscore a worrying trend of prioritizing political expedience over the rights and safety of marginalized communities, prompting urgent calls for accountability and action.

Author

Rutger

Like
Bookmark
Comment

Related Posts

Virginia Senate Committee Rejects Anti-Transgender Bills

This week, the Virginia Senate Health and Education Committee made a decisive move against discrimination by rejecting three bills that targeted transgender individuals and their rights. These bills, which were ultimately tabled, had significant implications for both transgender athletes and minors seeking gender-affirming care in the state. The committee's actions represent a victory for equality [...]

Congressman Criticizes Former President Over Response to Tragic Plane Incident

Lawmaker Speaks Out Against Former President's Remarks In a recent turn of events, Congressman Robert Garcia openly criticized former President Donald Trump's reaction to a catastrophic plane crash near Washington D.C., labeling Trump's comments as "irresponsible and monstrous." Garcia's remarks were made during a press conference where he expressed his disappointment with the former president's s [...]

Thailand Celebrates Historic Day with Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage

Excitement and joy swept across Thailand today as a groundbreaking law allowing same-sex couples to legally marry came into effect. Thousands of couples nationwide eagerly registered their marriages, marking a significant milestone in the country’s journey towards equality and acceptance. In Bangkok, the capital city, hundreds of couples gathered at a grand registration event held at a prominent [...]

Want to write an article or get interviewed?