Rutger published: LGBTQ Landmark Study Removed from National Park Service Website

The removal of a significant 2016 theme study, which shed light on the history of the LGBTQ community, from the National Park Service (NPS) website has caused considerable alarm within the community. The study, recognized as a groundbreaking work, has been a pivotal resource in acknowledging the contributions of LGBTQ individuals in American history.

Recently, the NPS faced directives to eliminate the terms "T" and "Q" from "LGBTQ" in all internal and external communications. This instruction led to a significant backlash, particularly when transgender references were removed from the Stonewall National Monument’s webpage.

An internal conflict emerged regarding the fate of the LGBTQ Theme Study. Some political appointees under the Trump administration called for the removal of transgender content, while some NPS staff argued against altering the document, which would undermine the study's academic integrity. Eventually, the decision was made to remove the entire study, a move seen by many as deeply troubling.

The LGBTQ Theme Study came about in response to a 2014 grant from the Gill Foundation to the NPS, which aimed to rectify the lack of historic LGBTQ sites in national records. This initiative culminated in the 2016 publication of a comprehensive study, marking a significant step forward for the LGBTQ community in gaining recognition within the broader tapestry of American history.

The study, titled "LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History," was described as a publication produced by the National Park Foundation for the NPS, funded by the Gill Foundation. Each chapter was authored and peer-reviewed by experts in LGBTQ Studies, ensuring its scholarly credibility.

Impact of Removal

The removal of the theme study has sparked fears that future initiatives to recognize LGBTQ monuments and projects may be jeopardized. When contacted for comment, the National Park Service cited adherence to an executive order issued during the Trump administration, which sought to "Defend Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restore Biological Truth to the Federal Government." This order, along with agency directives to halt all Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, was given as the rationale for the study's removal.

Marc Stein, director of OutHistory, a public history website dedicated to generating evidence-based LGBTQ research, expressed profound concern in a detailed statement following the removal. He highlighted the historical marginalization of LGBTQ histories, stating, "Our histories have been appropriated, censored, commodified, distorted, erased, falsified, marginalized, pathologized, rejected, silenced, and simplified."

Stein's statement underscored the resilience and continuing struggles of the LGBTQ community: "They think they can erase trans and queer people from history, remove trans women of color from the history of Stonewall, pretend that LGBTQ+ people did not exist, did not struggle, did not fight, did not suffer, did not survive, did not thrive. If they think any of this, they have never experienced or witnessed our perseverance, our rage, our resilience, our joy."

A Call to Action

The removal of the LGBTQ Theme Study is seen by many advocates as a call to action to resist attempts at erasure and to continue the fight for recognition and inclusion. The study itself was more than a collection of historic data; it was a testament to the progress made by those in the LGBTQ community striving for visibility and acceptance.

Activists and historians alike are calling for the reinstatement of the study and are urging the public to engage with and support efforts to document and celebrate LGBTQ history. The theme study was a tool for education and awareness, intended to elevate the stories of those who have been historically silenced.

This incident highlights the ongoing challenges faced by marginalized groups in preserving their histories against political pressures that seek to render them invisible. It is a reminder of the importance of continued advocacy and vigilance in the face of efforts to undermine efforts towards equity and representation.

The removal of the LGBTQ Theme Study from the National Park Service website represents not just the loss of a document, but a larger struggle for historical recognition and the fight against erasure. The community's response seeks to ensure that the legacy of LGBTQ contributions is not only remembered but also celebrated for future generations.

Author

Rutger

Like
Bookmark
Comment

Related Posts

Meet 16 LGBTQ+ Wrestling Stars as WWE Makes Netflix Debut

World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), while not historically renowned for its LGBTQ+ representation, is increasingly becoming a space that celebrates diversity and inclusivity. As WWE makes its anticipated debut on Netflix, it’s the perfect time to spotlight the LGBTQ+ wrestlers who are making an impact in the ring. The grand event was streamed live on Netflix on January 6th from the Intuit Dome [...]

Karine Jean-Pierre Bids Emotional Farewell in Final White House Briefing

In an emotional farewell to the White House press corps, Karine Jean-Pierre, the groundbreaking press secretary, concluded her tenure with gratitude and reflection. As the first openly LGBTQ+ and Black press secretary for a U.S. president, Jean-Pierre expressed her deep appreciation for the opportunity, describing her role as "the honor of a lifetime." Reflecting on Historic Tenure Jean-Pierre be [...]

RFK Jr Appointed as US Health Secretary: Controversies and Concerns

IntroductionRobert F. Kennedy Jr., a well-known figure for his controversial views on vaccines and public health, has recently been appointed as the US Health Secretary. This decision has sparked widespread debate, given Kennedy's history of promoting conspiracy theories and questionable claims regarding health and science. The Political Journey of RFK Jr.Kennedy, a lawyer with a background in en [...]

Want to write an article or get interviewed?