Labour Plans to Revive University Free Speech Legislation Amidst Concerns of Hate Speech

The Labour government is moving forward with plans to reintroduce a contentious university 'free speech' law, raising concerns about the potential for hate speech on campuses.

The legislation, initially passed by the Conservative government in 2023, known as the Higher Education Freedom of Speech Act, was designed to empower the Office for Students (OfS) to impose fines on universities, higher education providers, and student unions that fail to uphold free speech principles. It also established a complaints mechanism for students, staff, and visiting speakers who felt their free speech rights were being infringed upon.

This move comes in the wake of several high-profile student protests against controversial speakers on campuses. One notable incident involved gender-critical academic Kathleen Stock, who was invited to speak at the Oxford Union. Her appearance sparked condemnation from various Oxford colleges and over 100 Oxford academics, prompted violent threats against the university's LGBTQ+ president, and led to a protest where a student glued their hand to the floor during her speech.

Despite the initial approval of the bill, it was halted after Labour's resounding electoral victory in July, as critics voiced serious concerns that the legislation might enable hate speech, allowing voices such as Holocaust deniers to gain a platform on campuses.

According to a report by the BBC, a government source has indicated that the legislation is being revisited, although it remains unclear whether any amendments will be made to the provisions of the act.

Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, paused the legislation in July 2024, citing its unsuitability and potential to expose students to harmful hate speech on campuses. She expressed her intention to clarify her long-term plans for the legislation soon, acknowledging concerns about the burdens it might impose on education providers and the OfS.

In contrast, Tory shadow education secretary Laura Trott has expressed support for the revival of the bill, emphasizing the need for the inclusion of a statutory tort to strengthen the legislation.

Vivienne Stern, chief executive of Universities UK, speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, emphasized the importance of freedom of speech in universities. "Universities have been diligently preparing for the act, considering how to enhance their own policies," Stern commented. "However, there are aspects of this act that could complicate university operations and hinder their ability to fulfill legal obligations related to free speech, harassment, and hate speech."

Professor Shitij Kapur, president of King’s College London and chair of a Universities UK freedom of speech advisory group, writing in The Telegraph, highlighted the critical nature of freedom of speech and academic freedom in universities. "Universities should foster environments where all ideas, especially controversial ones, are expressed, debated, and refined to benefit students and society," Kapur wrote. "It is essential that our universities are seen as places where lawful ideas can be discussed."

Kapur also noted that some individuals believe certain topics have become taboo at universities, which he deemed unacceptable. "Universities are not intended to be Speakers’ Corners where unfounded opinions can be freely expressed. Academic freedom must come with the responsibility to support ideas with evidence and reason, and debates should be conducted civilly," he added.

The discussion around this legislation continues to be a topic of significant importance and debate, with strong opinions on both sides. As the Labour government considers reintroducing the bill, the conversation around free speech and the boundaries of acceptable discourse on university campuses remains as relevant as ever.

We invite you to share your thoughts on this issue in the comments below. Please ensure that all discussions remain respectful and constructive.