Fighting for Equality: The Role of Democratic Governors in Protecting LGBTQ+ Rights

"We must face the reality that the upcoming administration could pose significant challenges," state Rep. Leigh Finke (D), who authored Minnesota’s trans refuge law, emphasized. She warned against underestimating the potential difficulties.
Finke acknowledges the widespread concern among her constituents and the broader queer community regarding a potential second term for Donald Trump. Although the inauguration hasn’t occurred, many queer individuals are already taking measures such as updating legal documents and getting married.

Governors have a pivotal role in safeguarding LGBTQ+ rights when the president-elect has threatened to undermine trans rights. Questions arise about the legal challenges of overturning marriage equality and the implications for states with existing bans.

Insights for the LGBTQ+ Community

Jay Kaplan, lead attorney for the ACLU of Michigan LGBT Project, calls on Democrats in power to utilize all available strategies to protect the queer community. "We need leaders who are willing to stand up and speak out," Kaplan urged. "It’s not enough for the LGBTQ community to advocate alone. Those in power must resist fear and inaction."

Finke refuses to be intimidated. "Fascism thrives on fear," she noted, "and pits communities against each other. We must not aid in our own oppression by succumbing to fear."
"We will endure," Finke assured. "Queer communities do not need government permission to survive."

Several Democratic-led states are already positioning themselves to counteract potential federal actions. In California, Gov. Gavin Newsom plans to convene a special session to protect key values, including civil rights and reproductive freedom. By establishing a litigation fund, Newsom aims to "Trump-proof" the state.

Illinois and Colorado governors have founded Governors Safeguarding Democracy, a nonprofit dedicated to shaping policy and defending against autocratic threats. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker has declared the state a refuge for those whose rights are threatened.

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis reinforces a commitment to building an inclusive state. "Colorado will continue to be a place that protects and welcomes the LGBTQ community," Polis affirmed.

Kaplan outlines steps that governors could take, especially concerning transgender health, as federal support might dwindle. States can fund gender-affirming care, akin to how some states navigate abortion funding under the Hyde Amendment.

The potential ban on transgender military service could see opposition from blue state governors. During the previous ban, states like California and New Mexico defied federal directives. Kaplan highlights the importance of being prepared for impulsive federal decisions.

Blue States as LGBTQ+ Refuges

Ensuring access to transgender healthcare is crucial, as threats to end trans rights and redefine gender loom.

Some Democratic governors are willing to work with a Trump administration strategically, deciding when and where to take a stand, particularly to assist those in red states.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer pledges to continue fighting for LGBTQ+ rights. "Michigan is a welcoming place, and I will fight to keep it that way," she declared. "We’ve expanded civil rights protections, and as a mom of a gay woman, I want my daughter to have equal rights." Whitmer is considering executive orders to protect gender-affirming care.

Minnesota's trans refuge law is already making a difference, according to Rep. Finke. "People are coming from surrounding states to access care," she confirmed.

Marriage equality faces renewed scrutiny, with fears of overturning the landmark Obergefell case. Kaplan advises states to proactively remove anti-marriage amendments from their constitutions, as Colorado has done.

Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey asserts, "Massachusetts is committed to equality and freedom, proud of our marriage equality origins."

However, many states are unprepared for potential federal reversals. Kaplan warns that states with "zombie laws" need legislative action to fully protect marriage rights.

Challenges and the Path Forward

Recent congressional votes reveal not all Democrats may support LGBTQ+ rights steadfastly. The inclusion of anti-trans provisions in military funding bills was criticized by Finke.

"Representation matters," Finke stressed, highlighting the importance of trans voices in government to drive policy.

"Let trans people speak for their needs," she urged, noting that states without trans representation often lag in policies protecting trans individuals.

The upcoming years will test the resolve of Democratic governors in standing against federal actions threatening LGBTQ+ rights. The community continues to watch closely, ready to hold leaders accountable.

Stay informed by subscribing to our newsletter for the latest updates on issues affecting the LGBTQ+ community.